Skip to main content

Goal setting

I often find goal setting a tedious task, perhaps because I don't feel well-practiced in setting goals and benchmarks for achieving them. While I constantly reflect on my programming and practice (internally), it is rare that I have the luxury of time to act on that reflection to make significant changes. In reality, external forces often drive the changes I must make ie; - adoption of a new set/type of standards or curriculum, scheduling or facility changes, district-wide initiatives, etc. And those external forces may not align with what I believe professionally is the most essential next goal to improve the library program or my own practice.

I now am required to set two professional goals at the beginning of each school year. They must be connected to the supervisory union's continuous improvement plan, which is typically broadly connected to improving math or literacy scores on standardized tests. While I truly do not believe the validity of said tests nor the scores they produce, it is easy to come up with a library-related goal that can connect to an improvement plan like that. Things like diversifying the collection so that students see themselves and others in an effort to increase the likelihood of them choosing personal reading options and actually engaging with them in a meaningful way. Or helping to implement a 40-book challenge that significantly increases the amount of reading every student accomplishes independently. I hope that I'll be able to help my mentees see the connections between school improvement plans and excellent library programming or practice based on the standards and shared foundations.

Comments

  1. LaurieJuly 30, 2020 at 12:38 PM

    Wow, did you hit the nail on the head: "And those external forces may not align with what I believe professionally is the most essential next goal to improve the library program or my own practice." So often I find myself choosing goals based on what admin and the instructional coach are willing to evaluate me on versus what I feel is the most important goal for the library and the librarian. My goal is always in Domain 2, though my heart is usually in the others.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Judy KaplanAugust 2, 2020 at 1:02 PM

    Two things you have said jump out at me, too. One is that time-there is never enough to accomplish all those things that keep us juggling our roles and responsibilities-is a major challenge when we want to set our own directions in the school library. Let alone follow up with them by collecting evidence. That's what happen when you wear many hats, and are seen as a problem solver. (We have traveled that road before in our discussions!)
    Two-the outside forces that drive the continuous improvement plans always seem to focus narrowly on discrete goals that may or may not be aligned with improving practice in the school library. We have to continue to be creative and inventive to mesh the library goals, as you have suggested. Domain 2 is important, but you can pursue your personal goals just for you! (and the good of the school library).

    Well said!
    Judy

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kelly AhlfeldAugust 5, 2020 at 2:38 PM

    Rochelle,
    I am sure many of us relate to these issues of goal setting in our districts. Maybe this will be a year in which "Include" becomes a building goal for continuous improvement of our schools!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marilee AttleyAugust 6, 2020 at 8:56 AM

    Rochelle,
    Thank you for so clearly articulating the issues with the typical professional goal-setting in our district. I always feel that it's just another box to be checked off and not really helpful. I'm hoping that I can look at goal setting in a more personal way in the future. You've helped me to see that it can be valuable.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection #1: Listening

When I first heard about what Lipton calls "I" listening, I thought about the fact that as school librarians we are often in problem-solving mode. In fact, my job (being combined technology and library) often has me in crisis mode, jumping from one crisis to another. This focus on solving problems and offering solutions is likely to be difficult to set aside when meeting with someone as a mentor. It will be a challenge to shift to another type of listening and approach things as being a supportive growth agent rather than problem-solver. My listening survey results clarified this as being true, because my scores on sections A, C and D are all low and indicate my ability to be an effective listener in those realms. My scores of 13 and 14 on sections B and E respectively indicate that I will need to concentrate on NOT interjecting my own stories or recommending specific solutions to my mentee. If I am able to do so, I believe I can be a supportive and effective growth agent.In ...
Post a Comment
Read more

321 of Reflection on Module 2/Week 2

    It seems as if good mentoring is a lot like good teaching. There is an essential emphasis on the mentor-mentee relationship in a similar way that the best teachers create a strong and trusting relationship to connect with their students. This is absolutely essential for a trauma-transformed approach, which is an additional lens I now always use. Strong relationships and interpersonal connections create emotional safety, which is the first step in a student (or mentee) can then be open to making meaning of an experience. Unless that emotional safety is present, one cannot expect any growth to be possible.      Another way mentoring is similar to teaching is in the need to balance cognitive challenge with support. Understanding which stance to take in a mentoring relationship, and when to flexibly shift from one stance to another is paramount to providing that cognitive challenge with a supportive approach. If this is not accomplished, the mentee will likely e...
2 comments
Read more

Observations

I chose to watch case #980 on the Atlas/NBPTS site, of a middle school librarian conducting an introductory session with students making documentaries for National History Day. I used a blank framework and simply jotted down what I observed when I noticed that the librarian's actions matched up with one of the components in Domain 2 or 3. I had initially chosen just a single component, which is what I understood to be the task listed in the first step of the performance task "1. Select a component from Domains 2 or 3  ( from Danielson ) and collect evidence." However, I soon had to decide to broaden my approach, as there really was not enough evidence for just a single component. I believe that if I was using the framework for teachers, it would have been easier for this particular lesson, as it was really more of a classroom situation rather than an active library-use session. Reflecting on this point was meaningful for me, as I am frequently frustrated by the fact that ...
2 comments
Read more